Liverpool In response to the dissolution of the Friends of the Liverpool Public Library on Jan. 14, LPL Board of Trustees President Mark Spadafore issued the following statement:
“Though we are disappointed by the decision of the Friends of the Liverpool Public Library, Inc. to disband, the Board of Trustees and administration are moving forward with plans to continue to provide the highest level of service at the lowest possible tax rate to the Liverpool taxpayers.”
About 75 people attended the meeting Friends of the Liverpool Public Library Jan. 14 at the Ramada Inn in Salina.
There was significant discussion as to why the dissolution was taking place, and Friends board members took questions submitted on index cards. At the close of the 90-minute meeting, the membership voted 63 to 9 to dissolve the group.
The decision to dissolve came after the Friends and the library’s board of trustees were unable to come up with a memorandum of understanding that would formalize the relationship between the two entities.
The board had asked for a memorandum of understanding after the Friends received a $300,000 bequest from a former patron. Alfred Richberg left the money to the Friends, declaring that it should be spent on “services already in place with an emphasis on students.” The MOU was, in part, to determine how the money should be distributed. The Friends’ leadership and trustees began discussing the proposed MOU in August. But by mid-October, it was clear that no compromise could be reached. Sprague said the main sticking point was that the board wanted them to appoint an independent party to a committee to determine how the money should be spent.
“The Friends had discussed it, and we decided to form a committee to accept proposals from the library and look them over. If the proposal fit the criteria laid out in the will, it would be granted,” Sprague told the Star-Review. “One of their suggestions was, ‘How about if you get a proposal and decide not to approve it, we form another committee with one Friends member, one member of the library board and one neutral party, just someone from the community?’”